The second chapter of Comic Relief was very interesting. I was
fascinated when he discussed humor in relation to psychology, emotions,
disengagement, and play. I reacted with awe and wondered how these philosophers
came up with what humor is or is not. Now, I wonder how much more we will
discover about laughter and humor in the future. Also, since I was more
familiar with his writing style, the chapter was easier to understand. His
writing style is still formal, but he used words that I was more familiar with.
It was also easier to understand because he was writing about humor in more
modern times, so his examples were relevant to this day and age. Overall, I was
able to understand what he was trying to say. I was relieved because I was able
to have a better reading experience.
I was intrigued when the author wrote how humor should not be classified
as an emotion. I had never thought about humor and emotion before, so I had a
hard time believing that some scholars did consider it as an emotion. This sparked
my curiosity about the subject, and I carefully read to learn more. Humor is
not the same as emotion because emotions are caused by “beliefs and desires”
which lead to action, and humor does not necessarily have to be caused by these
factors (Morreall 28). For example, in order to find an eggplant that looks
like Richard Nixon humorous, he does not have to believe that the eggplant was
Nixon’s head, or have any desires about it for the eggplant to amuse him. After
reading this section and applying this theory to examples from my own life, I was
surprised when I realized that he was right. In order to find something to be
amusing, you do not have to believe anything about it or have desires for it,
you just have to find it funny (Morreall 29).
I
was extremely puzzled after reading the section on locutionary acts. I
definitely had to reread this section a few times, and I am still not sure if I
understood it. I understood what a locutionary act is. I know we say many
locutionary statements each day. For example, I have told my roommate “the
trash is almost full.” This statement both conveys meaning/information and
gives a command. We cannot just say “gkbfj jiheit,” because there is no meaning
in that statement. It is not a command, just gibberish (Morreall 34). I was
slightly more puzzled reading about the illocutionary act. I eventually
understood that this is performed in performing a locutionary act. For example,
I advise my roommate to take out the trash when I say the trash is almost full.
But the definition that really frustrated me was the perlocutionary act. I did
not enjoy reading this paragraph because it was poorly explained. He said that
it “is an act performed by means of performing an illocutionary act.” I got a
headache just thinking about it. In the example he provides in the book, does
it mean that it is performing an illocutionary act? So is it the same thing as
an illocutionary act? If so, it seems like a counterproductive term (Morreall
35).
I
found Provine’s research on laughter interesting. He found that when most
laughter during conversations “is not a response to jokes or other formal
attempts of humor.” In other words, we laugh after saying phrases such as “how
are you,” “are you sure,” and “I hope we all do well.” At first, I did not
agree with this statement, and I was surprised that Provine got to this
conclusion. But I then remembered a conversation I had earlier with a friend of
mine before a quiz. We were nervous, and she said how she hoped she did well,
and then both she and I chuckled nervously. I was intrigued by this information,
because normally you associate laughter with a joke or funny story. I never
even realized that laughter could come after a statement or conversation that
is not normally “funny” or “witty” (Morreall 39).
The
second chapter of Comic Relief forced
me to think differently about how I view humor and emotions. Although some
parts were confusing, I actually found some parts enlightening. This book helped
me find examples of humor and laughter in my everyday life, and helped me to
appreciate the value of humor.
Hi Paige, Thanks once more for your thoughtful response to Morreall. You don't have to worry about the locution and illocution parts. What Morreall is trying to convey is that humor is disengaged; it does not have sub levels of unspoken communication. The other important point hers is that all humor is conditional and personal, depending on the context. Interesting stuff. dw
ReplyDelete